Interprofessional Education Starting to think about IPE | |
Portfolio
Did You Know... |
Starting to think about Interprofessional Education (IPE)The literature says:The benefits of collaboration and Interprofessional education include: The potential drawbacks include:
What people working in health care teams say:In this video clip from the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute we see that interprofessional teams can have a clarity of purpose with the patient at the centre. Members of the team speak about their experiences and highlight improved patient outcomes, increased patient safety and reduced staff burnout as part of their experience of working in an interprofessional team. Teamwork in Healthcare: Promoting Effective Teamwork in Healthcare in Canada www.chsrf.ca
In this video health discipline students speak about their experiences of working in the well functioning team environment at the GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre in Vancouver, BC . The students also experience the patient as the centre of the team and talk about how working together creates understanding, trust and respect between disciplines. Vancouver Coastal Health (c)2007
Are you ready for IPE?
There is a rapidly growing body of literature about IPE, some of which looks at readiness for learning and practicing in this way. One particular scale [8] looks at factors in three areas:
Before engaging in IPE we must:
For true interprofessional learning and practice we must hold all disciplines in positive regard and see our own role as one among equals.
The RIPLS (Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale)[8] has been the subject of much debate[9][10] but it includes some of the central ideas behind IPE. The following statements show readiness for interprofessional learning, true or false?
_________________________________ 1. Butow P,Devine R, Boyer M, Pendlebury S, Jackson M, Tattersall MHN. Cancer consultation preparation package: Changing patients but not physicians is not enough. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22:4401-4409. 2. Kristjanson L, Dudgeon D,Nelson F, Henteleff P, Balneaves L. Evaluation of an interdisciplinary training program in palliative care: Addressing the needs of rural and Northern communities. Journal of Palliative Care. 1997;13:5-12. 3. Norton SA,Talerico KA. Facilitating end-of-life decision-making: Strategies for communicating and assessing. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2000;26:6-13. 4. Morita T, Akechi T, Masayuki I, Kizawa Y, Kohara H, Mukaiyama T et al. Late referrals to specialized palliative care service in Japan. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23:263-2644. 5. Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Rubenfeld GD. Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the Intensive Care Unit. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2005; 171:844-849. 6. Woods LW, Craig JB, Dereng N. Transitioning to a hospice program: Identifying potential barriers to a seamless transition. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing. 2006;8: 103-111. 7. Fineberg IC, Wenger NS, Forrow L. Interdisciplinary education: Evaluation of a palliative care training intervention for pre-professionals. Academic Medicine. 2004;79:769-776. 8. Parsell G, Bligh J. The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students forinterprofessional learning (RIPLS). Medical Education. 1999;33:95-100. 9. McFadyen AK, Webster VS, MacLaren WM. The test-retest reliability of a revised version of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale(RIPLS). Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2006;20:633-639. 10. McFadyen AK, Webster V, Strachan K, Figgins E, Brown H, McKechnie J. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learnign Scale: A possible more stable sub-scale model for the original version of RIPLS. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005;19:595-603. |